阅读理解10.0分
英语

(C)

Daniel Anderson, a famous psychologist, believes it’s important to distinguish television’s influences on children from those of the family. We tend to blame TV, he says, for problems it doesn’t really cause, overlooking our own roles in shaping children’s minds.

One traditional belief about television is that it reduces a child’s ability to think and to understand the world. While watching TV, children do not merely absorb words and images (影像). Instead, they learn both explicit and hidden meanings from what they see. Actually, children learn early the psychology of characters in TV shows. Furthermore, as many teachers agree, children understand far more when parents watch TV with them, explaining new words and ideas. Yet, most parents use an educational program as a chance to park their kids in front of the set and do something in another room.

Another argument against television is that it replaces reading as a form of entertainment. But according to Anderson, the amount of time spent watching television is not related to reading ability. TV doesn’t take the place of reading for most children; it takes the place of similar sorts of recreation, such as listening to the radio and playing sports. Things like parents’ educational background have a stronger influence on a child’s reading. “A child’s reading ability is best predicted by how much a parent reads.” Anderson says.

Traditional wisdom also has it that heavy television-watching lowers IQ (智商) scores and affects school performance. But here, too, Anderson notes that no studies have proved it. In fact, research suggests that it’s the other way around. “If you’re smart young, you’ll watch less TV when you’re older,” Anderson says. Yet, people of lower IQ tend to be lifelong television viewers.

For years researchers have attempted to show that television is dangerous to children. However, by showing that television promotes none of the dangerous effects as conventionally believed, Anderson suggests that television cannot be condemned without considering other influences.

导读:本文叙述一名心理学家Daniel Anderson对孩子们看电视的看法,打破了以往人们认为看电视对孩子不好的看法。他认为孩子们看电视不知学到显现出来的东西;父母陪孩子看电视,孩子可以学到更多知识;孩子看电视并没有代替孩子阅读,并没有影响孩子智商。

36. By watching TV, children learn _________.

37. An educational program is best watched by a child _________.

38. Which of the following is most related to children’s reading ability?

39. Anderson believed that _________.

40. What is the main purpose of the passage?

第1小题正确答案及相关解析

正确答案

B

解析

根据第二段的Instead,they learn both explicit and hidden meamings from what they see.可知孩子们通过看电视,可以学到限行和隐藏的意义,因此不仅仅学到隐藏的意思。所以选择B。

考查方向

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。

解题思路

事实细节题,直接信息理解、是非判断、年代数字、例证题。确定题目关键词,在文章中找到对应部分,回到题目逐一对照。

易错点

把握不住细节信息。

第2小题正确答案及相关解析

正确答案

C

解析

根据第二段的“Furthermore,as many teachers agree,children understand far more when parents watch TV with them“孩子们有父母陪着看电视理解的更多”,故推断教育节目最好是父母陪着看。所以选择C。

考查方向

本题考查了学生推理判断的能力。

解题思路

推理判断题。抓住文章主旨、紧扣作者思维模式找突破口。

易错点

把握不住相关要点。

第3小题正确答案及相关解析

正确答案

D

解析

根据第三段的“A child’s reading ability is best predicted by how much a parent reads”Anderson says.可知父母的阅读量对孩子的阅读能力影响最大。所以选择D

考查方向

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。

解题思路

事实细节题,直接信息理解、是非判断、年代数字、例证题。确定题目关键词,在文章中找到对应部分,回到题目逐一对照。

易错点

把握不住细节信息。

第4小题正确答案及相关解析

正确答案

C

解析

根据第四段的“If you’re smart young you’ll watch less TV when you’re older”可知如果你小时越聪明,长大看电视看的越少。所以选择C。

考查方向

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。

解题思路

事实细节题,直接信息理解、是非判断、年代数字、例证题。确定题目关键词,在文章中找到对应部分,回到题目逐一对照。

易错点

把握不住细节信息。

第5小题正确答案及相关解析

正确答案

D

解析

根据最后一段的Anderson suggests that television cannot condemned without considering other infuluences.“Anderson认为不应该按照常规,不靠路电视的其他影响而去谴责电视”故推断这篇文章的目的是呈现Anderson打破常规的想法,所以选择D。

考查方向

本题考查了学生推理判断的能力。

解题思路

推理判断题。抓住文章主旨、紧扣作者思维模式找突破口。

易错点

把握不住相关要点。