C
If asked if space exploration should continue, most Americans would give an immediate response either in favor of continuing or in favor of ending space exploration. A common response would be that space exploration is a waste of money. An average American, uneducated on the subject, might believe that the government is wasting billions of dollars on the research that has no merit. Someone strange to the subject might say that a space shuttle goes up once in a while and that is about all that happens. Research is ongoing and continues when there are no shuttles being launched. This also costs the government money. Does the extreme cost of space exploration make sense?
One argument is that the government is wasting money on the research not being used on Earth. Actually, the money goes to workers and scientists that support National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) missions (任务), and goes to major companies that play important roles in major sectors of the US economy. Boeing is a partner of NASA for aircraft, the same company that makes commercial aircraft for the airline industry.
Another benefit to continuing space exploration is the many spinoff (衍生的) technologies it provides. The artificial heart resulted from experiments on the space shuttle. The handheld Jaws of Life used to save victims from car accidents originated from the system used to separate the space shuttle from its booster rockets. Insulation in homes that keeps them warm and energy efficient is based on the technology used to insulate the space shuttle.
There are direct benefits to the economy provided by NASA missions as well as spinoff technologies. These advances are found in food, building materials, medical procedures and the vehicles we drive. While it can be proven that billions of dollars that could be used elsewhere is being spent on space exploration, the benefits it provides outweigh the terrible aspects. As a matter of fact, the money spent helps to improve the quality of our lives.
63. How is Paragraph 2 mainly developed?
64. The function of Jaws of Life is to _____.
65. In the author’s opinion, space exploration _____.
66. What would be the best title for the text?
analyses n.分析;故选项A正确。
根据第二段“Actually, the money goes to workers and scientists that support National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) missions (任务), and goes to major companies that play important roles in major sectors of the US economy.”可知,本段是在通过分析得出太空探索利国利民的观点。
大意归纳不准致错。
function n.功能,save people from traffic accident 挽救车祸中的人;故选项A正确。
根据下文“The handheld Jaws of Life used to save victims from car accidents…”可知,液压剪的功能主要营救车祸中的受难者。
信息提取与匹配错误。
benefit v.使受益;benefit us in many ways 在很多方面使我们受益;故选项C正确。
根据最后一段“…space exploration, the benefits it provides outweigh the terrible aspects”可知,作者认为太空开发给我们带来了很多利益。
信息提取与匹配错误。
space exploration 太空开发,worth the cost 值得花费;故选项B正确。
文章从开头提出问题到回答问题,都是在围绕着太空开发是否值得的问题进行,最后得出的结论是太空开发利大于弊。
文章主旨归纳不准致错。