C
A study of school design has discovered that school design can influence a child’s development by as much as 25 percent—over the course of an academic year. The 751 pupils using 34 classrooms across seven primary schools in Blackpool were studied by the University of Salford. Standardized data—such as age, gender(性别) and academic performance—were collected on each child at the start and end of the year, while each classroom was evaluated for quality on ten different environmental factors, such as direction for natural light, shape, color and temperature.
The results, published in Building and the Environment, showed that the architecture and design of classrooms has an important role to play in influencing academic performance. Six of the environmental factors—color, choice, connection, complexity, flexibility and light—were clearly correlated with grade scores.
Architect Peter Barrett, the study’s head author, said, “This is the first time a whole assessment has been made that successfully links the overall impact directly to learning rates in schools. The impact identified is in fact greater than we imagined.” According to the results, once the differences between the “worst” and “best” designed classrooms in the study were taken into account, it was found that the influence that “best” designed classrooms bring is equivalent(相等的) to the progress that a typical pupil would be expected to make over a year.
The results are particularly interesting as the government has introduced a controversial series of standardized templates(模板) for new school buildings, with the purpose of reducing the costs of hiring architects. The opinion on a range of strictly-defined design features replaces the previous Labour government’s more architecturally luxurious Building Schools for the Future program, which was canceled by education secretary Michael Gove. He has claimed that his department’s new Priority School Building Program, and its basic plans, will put an end to a situation which he believes existed only to “make architects richer”.
46. It can be inferred that the standardized data .
47. The underlined phrase “correlated with” has the closest meaning to .
48. What did Peter Barrett think of the result of the study?
49. Why did Michael Gove cancel the program?
50. What’s the best title for the passage?
根据文章第一段,调研人员在学年开始喝结束分别进行一次数据采集,可以判断:调查数据A“基于10项指标”B“一个学年采集两次”C“大学自己采集”D“因为学校环境不同而改变”。联系文章主旨,所以选择B。
推理判断题。抓住文章主旨、紧扣作者思维模式找突破口。
把握不住相关要点。
根据文章第二段,这六项指标和孩子们的分数有明显的关系。可以判断:A“与……有关”B“与……相比”C“无关”D“基于”。所以选择A。
事实细节题,直接信息理解、是非判断、年代数字、例证题。确定题目关键词,在文章中找到对应部分,回到题目逐一对照。
把握不住细节信息。
根据文章第三段,彼得认为此次调查取得了前所未有的成功。可以判断:A“不可信”B“棒极了”C“有争议”D“和他预期相反”。联系文章主旨,所以选择B。
推理判断题。抓住文章主旨、紧扣作者思维模式找突破口。
把握不住相关要点。
根据文章第四段,取消该项目可以减少财政支出,所以选择D。
事实细节题,直接信息理解题。确定题目关键词,在文章中找到对应部分,回到题目逐一对照。
把握不住细节信息。
根据文章,从头到尾都在讲学校设计和孩子分数之间的关系,可以判断:A学校设计较大影响老师生活B学校设计较大影响老师工作C学校设计较大影响孩子兴趣D学校设计较大影响学生分数。联系文章主旨,所以选择D。
主旨大意题。抓取文章大意,综合事实。
把握不住文章中心。