We have a real crisis in this country in the basic understanding of science. It affects our global competitiveness as a country, our national security, and the effectiveness of our social system. The misunderstanding about science is blinding our eyes.
We know that an awful lot of teachers who are teaching science today have not been properly empowered to do so. School frequently is
n’t testing whether you understand something but whether you’re familiar with it. What’s Newton’s second law? You say F=ma, and you get an A. That does not reflect a deep understanding of Newtonian mechanics. Science education is not just a body of facts; it’s a process. To present it with appeal and excitement you need to picture it as a detective story—asking questions, making observations, and collecting evidence. You test and you fail but, you know, failure can lead to discovery.
Another challenge we face is that science is often viewed as too hard, for experts only. But I don’t actually think it’s that difficult. People see science every day. They look outside and see weather and nature. They push a button in their house and the lights go on. Everybody’s dealing with science every day. They just don’t call it that. And it’s important they do. In fact, science is determining the quality and outcomes of their life.
Science needs creativity. And one of the best ways to be creative is to think “out of the box”. However, we need more courage when we come to practice. Take me for example. Very early in my teens I decided to educate myself. I realized I would never be a very good student because I didn’t like teachers judging me by what I thought were arbitrary (主观臆断的) standards. I decided I’d let the world judge me by whether I could do something of value—solve a problem or build something. That’s why I quit school early and risked everything to start a company. I risked everything I had because I had nothing to lose. I’d rather fail at trying to do something really big than succeed at being medium.
“When’s the right age to think creatively?” you may ask. I’d say in the womb (母腹)! Kids don’t have anxieties about trying to avoid failure. They are full of imagination and much more willing to fail. Just watch a 3-year-old. They touch everything, and if it hurts they don’t touch it again. They learn everything at a breathtaking rate. Start to think out of the box as early as you can, because it’s more likely to take you to places that you can’t predict, schedule and budget for. Do all that when you can bear the insecurity.
50. The author believes that they actually have a problem in________.
51. According to the passage, science teachers should ________.
52. Paragraph 3 indicates that _______.
53. The author takes his own example to say ________.
54. What’s the tone of the passage?
事实细节题。根据文章第一段第一句“We have a real crisis in this country in the basic understanding of science.”可知,真正的危机在于对科学的理解。
事实细节题。根据文章第一段第一句“We have a real crisis in this country in the basic understanding of science.”可知,真正的危机在于对科学的理解。
不仔细审题
事实细节题。根据文章第二段“Science education is not just a body of facts; it’s a process. To present it with appeal and excitement you need to picture it as a detective story—asking questions, making observations, and collecting evidence.”可知,自然科学教师更应侧重于学习过程。
事实细节题。根据文章第二段“Science education is not just a body of facts; it’s a process. To present it with appeal and excitement you need to picture it as a detective story—asking questions, making observations, and collecting evidence.”可知,自然科学教师更应侧重于学习过程。
不联系上下文
整体理解第三段,主要讲述的是科学并没有人们想象的那么高不可攀,其实它就在我们身边。
整体理解第三段,主要讲述的是科学并没有人们想象的那么高不可攀,其实它就在我们身边。
以偏概全
事实细节题。根据文章第四段第一句“Science needs creativity. And one of the best ways to be creative is to think “out of the box”. However, we need more courage when we come to practice.”可知,作者讲述自己的例子是为了说明科学需要创造力,需要不走寻常路。
事实细节题。根据文章第四段第一句“Science needs creativity. And one of the best ways to be creative is to think “out of the box”. However, we need more courage when we come to practice.”可知,作者讲述自己的例子是为了说明科学需要创造力,需要不走寻常路。
不联系上下文
A. Questioning. 质问 B. Encouraging. 鼓励C. Praising. 赞扬D. Complaining. 抱怨
结合整篇文章可知作者在鼓励人们在自然科学方面勇于思考,敢于创新。
A. Questioning. 质问 B. Encouraging. 鼓励 C. Praising. 赞扬D.Complaining. 抱怨 结合整篇文章可知作者在鼓励人们在自然科学方面勇于思考,敢于创新。
不理解文章主旨